Council to cut time of speeches - ban photography
Northern Beaches Council is proposing to cut the amount of time residents and councillors will be allowed to speak at meetings and to ban photography anywhere near them.
This will be the second time the Northern Beaches Council has sought to limit the Public Forum that opens each Meeting where residents may speak to Motions or Items or present insights into matters directly impacting them and the community.
At the February 27 2018 Meeting the draft Meeting Code proposed abolishing the Public Forum but would still include the Public Address. Then it was proposed that, if the draft Code of Meeting Practice was adopted, the Public Forum would continue as a separate community meeting held five times a year in venues rotating across the region and not be part of the council meetings.
At that Meeting, amendments moved and seconded by Cr. De Luca and Ferguson meant the Vox populi would persist.
The same idea is again being regurgitated to see if anyone will salute.
On Saturday July 27 2024 Pittwater Greens Councillor Miranda Korzy said she opposed staff proposals contained in a draft Code of Meeting Practice, to cut speakers’ time during public forums and addresses from three to two minutes.
These had once been 5 minutes but had been reduced under the NBC.
Similarly, all councillors would be limited to speeches of two minutes during the meetings, unless they had proposed a motion, Ms Korzy said.
A ban on photography during meetings would also be extended to before and after, “whilst in the vicinity of the meeting location”, she said.
“Cutting speeches to two minutes might be a great relief for some, but the loss of those 150 words might prevent someone from explaining the intricacies of a complicated issue or describing a particularly pertinent example.
“Meetings often run from 6pm to 11.30pm, with many of us arriving home well after midnight, and I would dearly love to see them shorter.
“We’re all aware they deteriorate after about 9pm with participants getting tired, niggling at each other across the floor and losing concentration.
“However, the proposed solution, based on the idea of making meetings more efficient, will add to the slow curtailment of democratic debate.
“The root of the problem is that the council unavoidably has too much business on its agenda, due to its size since the forced amalgamation, and some councillors’ antics delay progress through the agenda.
“The open-ended ban on photography is also an incursion on democracy, and a nonsense when the council itself screens the meetings online.
“Councillors and members of the community would be prevented from focusing the lens on those attending, even outside the chamber, which would limit anyone snapping photos showing numbers of supporters for any issue.”
The council will vote on Tuesday to place the draft Code of Meeting Practice on Public exhibition.
Pittwater Greens Councillor calls for review of tree management policy
Pittwater Greens Councillor Miranda Korzy is calling on Northern Beaches Council to review its tree management to avoid a repeat of the Ruskin Rowe blockade.
Ms Korzy said she has proposed a motion for the July 30 council meeting for a review of tree assessment, pruning and removal processes.
The motion also calls for examination of the funding needed to ensure trees can remain in place to the end of their useful life, she said.
For this to occur, council will need to implement its Tree Canopy Plan - as amended to protect existing canopy - which was passed at the September 2023 council meeting.
It must also develop a single tree management policy based on it, she said.
“The Ruskin Rowe blockade has highlighted weaknesses in council’s tree management and this motion is designed to ensure residents never have to take to the streets to protect our canopy again,” Ms Korzy said.
“I hear complaints from the community every week, if not several times a week, about tree removal, and residents’ support for the tree vigil has shown how much they value Pittwater’s tree canopy.
“Local arborists and ecologists are telling me the council has got it wrong on the Ruskin Rowe decision, so both in terms of process and outcome, I believe we must look at what’s led to the situation.
“I’m grateful that council staff are now reviewing the decision, although it has not been rescinded and contractors are currently booked to return to Ruskin Rowe. However, that’s not likely before late August.
“Pittwater residents love our trees for their natural beauty but they are also important assets, environmentally, socially and economically.”
Ms Korzy said the tree canopy saves residents and council money by preventing soil erosion and the consequent stormwater runoff - as well as providing habitat for wildlife.
Urban canopy can also reduce temperatures of the surrounding area by up to 10 degrees Celsius, protecting roads from extreme heat, meaning they deteriorate more slowly and are less costly to maintain.
Trees also absorb carbon dioxide and regulate soil moisture, reducing the presence of various greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Finally, trees improve mental health in the community.
The Notice of Motion reads:
That Council:
1. Undertake an internal review of its tree assessment, pruning and removal processes including:
a. Frequency of inspections of individual mature trees on public land.
b. The number of arborists on the relevant Council panel and the criteria used to assess and appoint them.
c. Standard instructions provided to arborists when undertaking tree assessments.
d. Consultation with the public regarding potential tree removals.
e. Actions taken to inform the public following identification of a high risk tree and mitigate risk.
f. Protocols for the review of tree removal and pruning decisions including the triggers for when these reviews are undertaken.
2. As part of that review, identify the funding required to:
a. Inspect and assess mature trees to safely retain them in situ for their useful life expectancy.
b. Prune, stag or completely remove unsafe mature trees across the LGA on an annual basis.
c. Maintain existing trees including ongoing watering of tubestock/saplings, fertilising, weeding around them, and mulching as foreshadowed in the Tree Canopy Plan.
3. Create a Tree Management Policy for Northern Beaches Council, consistent with the Tree Canopy Plan as resolved by Council in September 2023.
4. Within six months report to council on the outcome of the reviews in points 1. and 2. as well as the new draft Tree Management Policy.
From CEO in response to motion:
In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice Clause 4.15(a) I offer the following report on this matter to assist Council in the deliberation of this motion: A high-level review of the listed items could be undertaken within existing resources, noting that a revised tree policy is already in development. A more detailed review of each of these elements would be most appropriately dealt with using Council’s service review framework. Should this approach be preferred, one of the planned service reviews would need to be deferred (such as the Traffic and Transport review).
Manly Dam's plastic Trail Build: bushland being removed - wallabies pathway to water being blocked sMDCC states
- improve regionally significant open space, including links between bushland, parks, centres and waterways
- enable more effective public use of regionally significant open space
- improve access to a diverse mix of open space opportunities for the community of Greater Sydney and the Central Coast
- promote partnerships between state and local government
- support projects that demonstrate a commitment to improved outcomes for health, sustainability, climate change and communities.
- to provide and improve open space that supports housing supply.
Priority will be given to projects that increase and improve open space to support housing supply.
A large protected area of bushland and waterways, with a diversity of flora and fauna, high water quality and scenic value, that ensures protection of its natural environment and cultural values, conserves threatened species and communities, provides opportunity for a variety of recreational activities in a low-key natural setting, offers an educational asset and acknowledges its importance as a war memorial park.
IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL "STEWARDSHIP" ?Northern Beaches Council has the significant responsibility of caring for Manly Warringah War Memorial Park. Which, in recent years, has earned both "State Park" and "NSW Heritage" status because of its rich biodiversity values, as documented in this community initiated project https://manlydambiodiversityproject.orgIf you've visited the park recently you will have noticed a large swathe of ugly cleared vegetation (see above photos).This previously sensitive intact bushland was where small birds nested in safety, endangered pygmy possums found sanctuary and where wallabies had an unobstructed water source. Now, sadly, the ancient sandstone rocks are being drilled into to create footings for a $1.8 million plastic boardwalk.Some of Australia's top ecologists were involved in documenting wildlife and plants for the above linked to study. All of them recommended that there should be NO more fragmentation of bushland for tracks because of the negative impacts it was having on biodiversity. But it appears that yet again our Council would rather spend money on "infrastructure" than conserving this unique natural oasis. We have many many parks on the Northern Beaches but only one place where the natural bushland was specifically conserved to create Australia's only living war memorial. Imagine how $1.8m could be used to benefit our diminishing threatened species !!As the Save Manly Dam Catchment Committee we try and campaign to protect nature that cannot speak for itself (see Boardwalk Empire video in comments) and for the humans that love this wonderful wild environment. Sorry we failed you this time. Australia, not surprisingly, has the world's worst extinction rate.
Bayview's rejuvenated path + seawall completed
The popular path along the foreshore connecting Bayview and Church Point has received a major boost with the opening on Tuesday July 23rd of a new 200m footpath between Bayview Scout Hall and Bayview Baths after a 5-month construction.
The previous footpath had been impacted by coastal erosion which had caused it to become uneven in places and difficult to traverse.
People with prams or young ones on bikes will be able to comfortably share the path with people exercising or going for a stroll.
And an added bonus is the spectacular view out to Pittwater.
President of the Bayview Church Point Residents Association Peter Blanchard said he is very pleased that the project is completed.
"There is a twinkle in the eye of the Association to see this project come to fruition. This has been a collaboration between the Association, Council and the State Government. We're so pleased we lobbied the Council and the State Member to see this incredible project finished." Mr Blanchard said.
This $1.35m project was made possible thanks to a $600,000 grant from the NSW State Government’s Metropolitan Greenspace Program, as announced by former Pittwater MP Rob Stokes in June 2022.
Some mangroves needed to be removed to stabilise the bank. Mangrove seedling replanting will be undertaken at the end of construction with the aim, Council has stated, to replant more than were present prior to the works.
winter in pittwater
Past Features Archives (pre 2014)
Pittwater Online News was selected for preservation by the State Library of New South Wales and National Library of Australia. This title is scheduled to be re-archived regularly.
Archived Issues (2014 on) may be accessed here: pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/143700
Past Issues are also listed on site on the Community News page, by month.