September 1 - 28, 2024: Issue 634

 

For Those Whose Home Is Among The Gum Trees: Scamps, Labor Members, Greens, Australians at Local, State + Federal Level call for a Cessation of Habitat Destruction as NSW Government touts an 'Forestry Industry Action Plan' Consultation 

Updated September 14, 2024
Australians are aware by now that humans are not the only species that grieves over the death of a loved one and that those who have lost a family member never recover.


Your pet dog or cat can be cheeky, puzzled, angry, happy, sad, anxious and fearful. 

Although February 2024 footage of a male koala hugging a deceased female koala in South Australia may have been the first some people realised koalas experience loss, Australians know Australian wildlife will cry out when in fear, danger and when in pain - millions heard Lewis the koala cry while being rescued in the 2020 bushfires. 

Locals have heard ringtail possums shriek in fear when taken by a powerful owl or heard a mother brushtail cry inconsolably when a careless driver runs over her baby. 

People have witnessed flocks of cockatoos perched soundlessly or 'yelling' above a flock member who has been killed on a road, calling for them, crying for them. Bird 'funerals' are well-documented by scientists, as is how many pair for life and have family groups of generations within flocks.

We know they have their own individual personalities, their own natures. 

These colonies and flocks of wildlife also have 'home ranges' - places built into their DNA over countless generations about where the food trees are across the seasons, and how to migrate across the land to eat from them. They have times to make babies when food is traditionally more abundant, and may not make babies in drought seasons.

Like humans, they have home burrows, home streams, home trees.

At the July 2024 NSW Labor Party Annual Conference the Labor Environment Action Network (LEAN) was advocating for progress on two key issues: 

Action on deforestation - land clearing and native forest logging

stating;

'Australia is a global deforestation hotspot and NSW has been ranked the worst state for forest protection. The previous government weakened laws which have seen land clearing rates explode, to an astonishing rate of 382 football fields every day! We are also the only mainland state without a plan to transition from logging native forests to 100% plantation timber.'

And;

Supporting household electrification - 'Electrification is a leading way to reduce household energy costs whilst also addressing climate change and supporting domestic manufacturing. It is a win-win-win policy outcome for Labor, and NSW should be leading the way!'

LEAN, organised through 150 Labor branches across NSW, supported a motion (Motion 85) that could have led to the closure of native forestry and immediate transition to plantations.

The Motion, available on their website, reads:

{name} branch:

1. Congratulates the Minns and Albanese government’s environmental achievements after a decade of Liberal neglect.

2. Note that last year over 375 branches (170+ in NSW) passed motions calling on Labor to protect native forests, move to 100% plantation timber supply and end broad scale land clearing. ALP National Conference endorsed the need for a new National Forest Policy Statement and Minister Watt committed it would be delivered in this term of government.

3. Calls on Premier Minns and Ministers Sharpe and Moriarty to:

1. Urgently deliver reforms to stop runaway land clearing and work with farmers, providing incentives to restore and regenerate the land.

2. Transition to 100% plantation timber before the next state election.

3. Recognise the significant economic benefits to regional communities from protecting forests and restoring landscapes.

4. Calls on the Prime Minister, Ministers Watt and Plibersek to:

a. Deliver the new National Forest Policy Statement within this term of government.

b. Prioritize effective measures to end land broad scale clearing in Minister Plibersek’s Nature Positive Reforms.

An Introduction  reads:

Halt and reverse deforestation in NSW

Australia is the only developed nation to be listed as a global deforestation hotspot. NSW has been ranked the worst state for forest protection and restoration by WWF. This deforestation is being driven by land clearing and native forest logging. Habitat destruction is the single biggest threat to biodiversity in NSW, a leading cause of our extinction crisis.

Land clearing - Over the four years to 2021, NSW cleared an average of 95,000 ha and 50 million trees per annum, or 382 football fields every day. Land clearing is responsible for 10% of Australia's greenhouse gas emissions: 40 million tons in the year to June 2022. Ending deforestation is also important for agricultural market access as the EU and others have introduced regulations to penalize products linked to clearing. Prior to the 2023 election NSW Labor committed to “stop runaway land clearing”. The Labor platform also has commitments to “prevent broadacre clearing” and “ensure we achieve a net increase in vegetation cover”.

Native Forest Logging - NSW is also the only mainland state without a plan to phase out native forest logging. The industry is in structural decline, the government can either manage this transition or face a series of abrupt closures. NSW already sources over 94% of our wood products from plantations, getting to 100% plantations is possible. This industry is only surviving on taxpayer subsidies, the native forest division of Forestry Corporation persistently runs at a loss, totalling -$44m in the last 3 years. Ending logging in NSW would also avoid 64m tons of emissions out to 2050.

The Labor Party also supported a motion put forward by the CFMEU Manufacturing Division, which, with the support of Unions NSW, has pledged to support the state’s timber industry, an expansion of plantation estate and, crucially, extends support for the native forest industry “that creates rural, regional jobs and further down the supply chain in NSW.”

By August 1 Timber NSW and Forestry Australia, which has been lobbying to expand Australia’s carbon credits across all native forest tenures, including State forests, private native forests, forests managed by Traditional Owners, national parks and conservation reserves, were among the first to know of NSW Labor’s new policy on forestry as run by Wood Central in the report ''NSW Labor’s New Policy Binds Minns to $2.9B Timber Industry'.

Wood Central states it is; 'Australia’s first and only dedicated platform covering wood-based media across all digital platforms. Our vision is to develop an integrated platform for media, events, education, and products that connect, inform, and inspire the people and organisations who work in and promote forestry, timber, and fibre.'

Accordingly Wood Central ran:

NSW Labor’s new policy on forestry

NSW Labor recognises the value and role of our forests in storing carbon, protecting biodiversity and supporting regional communities. NSW Labor is strongly committed to contributing to the delivery of Australia’s commitments under the COP26 Glasgow Leaders Declaration on forests and land, which includes halting and reversing forest loss and land degradation by 2030 in recognition that deforestation increases greenhouse gas emissions.

NSW Labor also supports other priorities of the Forest & Climate Leaders’ Partnership, such as greening construction with sustainable wood, and supports a sustainable future for NSW’s forests and forest products industry to help achieve this objective.

Labor will update the NSW Forest Industry Roadmap to ensure it is contemporary and for purpose.

NSW Labor will:

  • Recognise the skills, knowledge and competencies of timber workers and their communities, as well as the central role First Nations communities play in restoring country and determining social, economic and environmental benefits flowing from forest management activity.
  • Expand NSWs plantation estate and processing and value adding capabilities to better satisfy increasing domestic and international demand for high-value, sustainably sourced and produced wood products, and develop an industry plan that facilitates regional job growth and vibrant sustainable communities.
  • Expand the objectives and benefits of public ownership and support, ensuring public investment delivers an equity stake or continued dividends for the people of NSW.
  • Support methods and systems for new management regimes for NSW forests that incentivise protection, conservation, restoration and/or sustainable use of NSW forests. This must prioritise the ongoing need for management, the effective use of by-products and restorative management where required along with the promotion of good and decent work.
  • Deliver the management and restoration of native forests, recognising and rewarding carbon and biodiversity values and the need for their active and ongoing management.
  • Harness the social, environmental, and economic benefits that our forests can provide.
  • Support increased supply of timber for residential housing construction, including support for new methods of engineered timber, modular housing and other methods to more economically utilize timber resources.

On August 26 the NSW Government announced to the rest of NSW residents the appointment of an expert panel to lead consultation on a 'Forestry Industry Action Plan', which the government states will outline the path NSW will take to ensure a sustainable timber industry that aligns with the government’s key environmental priorities.

The Statement reads:

The Independent Forestry Panel will be chaired by Peter Duncan AM who has more than 40 years’ experience in primary industries, infrastructure and regional NSW.

Professor Mary O’Kane AC and the Hon. Mick Veitch will also sit on the Panel.

The Panel will be tasked with consulting with a broad range of stakeholders and report to Government on the best options to achieve the balance between sustainable supplies of timber and our environmental commitments.

Stakeholders include representatives from the timber industry, forest growers, environment groups, unions, Aboriginal communities, local government, business, related industries, tourism, scientific experts and the Commonwealth Government.

The Plan will address the following key areas:

Sustainability of current and future forestry operations in NSW;

Environmental and cultural values of forests, including threatened species;

Community demand for timber products, particularly as relates to NSW housing, construction, mining, transport and retail;

The future of softwood and hardwood plantations and the continuation of Private Native Forestry in helping meet timber supply needs;

The role of State Forests in maximising the delivery of a range of environmental, economic and social outcomes;

Opportunities to realise carbon and biodiversity benefits and support carbon and biodiversity markets, and mitigate and adapt to climate change risks; and

Greenhouse gas emission impacts of different uses of forests and assessment of climate change risks to forests.

The former Coalition Government neglected to plan for the future of this industry, so the NSW Government is taking action to give certainty to communities, workers and industry.

To stay informed on the Independent Forestry Panel’s process, please register your interest at www.nsw.gov.au/have-your-say/forestry-industry-action-plan

Minister for the Environment Penny Sharpe said:

“The NSW Government is consulting on the future of forestry in NSW.

“Whether it’s hardwood, softwood or private native forest, our forests and the native species which call them home have faced challenges including bushfires, floods and the ongoing risks due to climate change.

“We want your input on what forests and a sustainable forestry industry will look like in the next 30 years.

“The expert panel will consult a wide range of stakeholders and we encourage everyone to have their say.”

Minister for Regional NSW Tara Moriarty said:

"We need both trees and wood, and we must strike the right balance for communities and our environment in regional NSW.

“Timber is a crucial part of our everyday lives, with timber needed for community and government priorities such as housing, transport infrastructure, electricity distribution, and freight transport.

“The families, businesses and communities that make up this industry will be considered for the Action Plan. Their knowledge and experience will be essential for understanding the issues and finding the solutions.

“Our timber workers also play a crucial role, when we need it most, to protect our forests and our communities during bushfires. They are part of our frontline in those difficult times, where their skills and equipment are critical in the fight.

“The consultative work that is set to go into this Action Plan will ensure all stakeholders are listened to and we arrive at the best future for the timber industry and sustainable state forests.”

two koalas sit on pile of logs

Photo: WWF

On Friday August 30 2024 the Office of Sue Higginson, Greens Member of the NSW Legislative Council and NSW Greens spokesperson for Climate Change, Environment, Planning, Justice & Attorney general, First Nations Justice &Heritage, Agriculture, Regional Communities, North Coast, Mid North Coast, New England and North West, released the following Statement:

Forests forgotten, Minister unaware of logging influence

Questions from the Greens in Budget Estimates have revealed that the Minister for the Environment was unaware of the details for the newly announced Independent Forestry Panel prior to the appointment of a former Forestry CEO. The new panel is set to advise the Government on the timber industry and environmental commitments, despite having no qualified forest scientist appointed. 

Greens MP and spokesperson for the environment Sue Higginson said “It’s a slap in the face to the 70% of NSW that support the end of native forest logging in this state, that the Government has appointed a former CEO of the Forestry Corporation to this panel and no expert in forest ecology,”

“That the Minister for the Environment couldn’t confirm that she even knew a former forestry executive was going to be appointed as the chair of this panel is deeply concerning and has given weight to the already low community trust in this process,”

“It’s not a criticism of the intelligence or ability of the panel members to question why the protection of native forests is not being represented. Both the Premier and the Minister have defended this decision but have not given any weight to the importance of genuine forest ecology qualifications,”

“We have already seen through the increased logging in the proposed Great Koala National Park that the Government is failing their environment commitments, this latest panel and industry plan is entrenching the political failure of the Minns Labor Government,”

“As long as the position of the Minister for the Environment is that native forest logging should take precedence over environment protection, forest dependent species will continue to be driven towards extinction,”

“If the Minister was not told about a former Forestry Executive being put forward for this panel, I have genuine concerns about how this information has been handled and how the decision on the Panel has been made by the Government. Was it intentional that they have not promoted Peter Duncan’s history in native forest logging, or is this just another industry vehicle to allow native forest logging to continue?” Ms Higginson said.

The day after the Government announced its 'Forestry Industry Action Plan' the North East Forest Alliance also pointed out Mr. Duncan was once the Chief Executive Officer of the Forestry Corporation and that The Hon. Mick Veitch was previously the ALP’s shadow Forestry Minister.

Members wonder how 'fair dinkum' any consultation would be. It all resounds like the prior coalitions government's Coastal IFOA debacle of 2018.

The previous NSW Government, despite widespread opposition, had already extended the Coastal Integrated Forestry Operations Approvals (IFOA) by 20 years in May 2018 when asking for community feedback.

Then Minister for Lands and Forestry Paul Toole and Minister for the Environment Gabrielle Upton said the Coastal IFOA remake was a vital step forward in the NSW Government’s forestry reform agenda.

“The NSW Government is committed to the long term and sustainable management of NSW’s forestry estate, for the benefit of the community, environment and our $2.4 billion forestry and product manufacturing industry,” Mr Toole said.

This also signalled the then NSW Government's intention to expand logging into old growth areas as well.

The NSW Conservation Council stated then, ''The Berejiklian government’s plan to “remap” old growth forest poses serious new threat to some of the best mature forests left in NSW.''

The previous government seemingly had plans to deny any future generations the opportunity to stand beneath and ancient tree and gaze up and up and up.

On February 16, 2018: NSW Nature Conservation Council stated:

''The Berejiklian government is putting threatened forest wildlife and an historic 20-year peace deal at risk by pushing ahead with a sham consultation process designed to lock in unsustainable logging indefinitely. The NSW Nature Conservation Council and NSW National Parks Association today walked away from stakeholder consultations on the extension of the state’s three Regional Forest Agreements.''

Regional Forest Agreements were struck in the late 1990s and early 2000s and delivered a fragile peace in the Forests Wars that had raged for decades through the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s.

Nature Conservation Council CEO Kate Smolski said: “We will not be party to a process that perpetuates the reckless mismanagement our precious forests.

Koala populations in NSW forests have plummeted over the past 20 years during which these agreements have been in place.

“We insist the government conduct independent scientific reviews that will give us a clear understanding of what harm forestry has done to our threatened wildlife over the past two decades before we decide how our forests will be managed for another generation.”

The current Labor Government also stated going into the 2023 election it would not be phasing out logging what's left either. However it did put a pause on the timber industry logging the home trees of the koalas then living in its proposed and still not here 'Great Koala National Park' on the north coast of NSW.

Koala homes are still being logged in the GKNP.

Koalas are still being struck and killed by cars at Appin too, with no fauna crossing as yet in place as their habitat homes are razed to benefit yet another developer. Three of what is left in that seemingly deliberate Koala Massacre died trying to cross their historical range in western Sydney in the past 7 days.

The North East Forest Alliance stated last week;

“We would welcome a truly independent and impartial review of logging of public native forests in NSW as the evidence is that it is neither economically nor ecologically sustainable.'' NEFA spokesperson Dailan Pugh said.

“In 2022/23 the Forestry Corporation lost $15 million on its native forestry operations, costing the NSW Government $1,281 per hectare to log the homes of Koalas and Greater Gliders. In addition the Forestry Corporation was paid $31 million of taxpayer’s money for its community service obligations in 2022/23, while also receiving regular massive public handouts.  

“Logging increases the risk of extinction of many threatened species, reduces stream flows and inflows to regional water supplies, increases wildfire risks to local communities, spreads weeds, increases erosion, while reducing the carbon stored in forests and forests’ ability to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere” Mr Pugh said.

''The north east NSW Blueprint Institute (2023) found that ending native forest logging in 2023–24, and instead utilising the land for carbon sequestration and tourism will deliver a net benefit valued at $45 million in present-day dollars. This includes the estimated cost of providing transitional packages to the industry as it shuts down, as well as the cost of breaking wood supply agreements that extend to 2028.''

“NEFA considers that if the NSW Government was fair dinkum about undertaking an independent assessment they would ensure the assessment was undertaken by a balanced panel that will fairly deal with our evidence.

“The appointment of an independent ecologist could provide the balance needed” Mr. Pugh said.

The Forest Alliance NSW released its response Statement the same day as the Government.

This reads:

'The Forest Alliance NSW is calling on a newly announced expert panel, set up by the Minns Labor Government to advise it on the future of forestry, to put ending native forest logging front and centre of their investigation.

Justin Field from the Forest Alliance NSW said: “The Alliance welcomes the process and will work constructively with the panel but it must fully investigate ending native forest logging to shift to a sustainable plantation based timber industry and to protect the state’s most iconic species like the Koala and Greater Glider.’ 

Stuart Blanch from the World Wide Fund for Nature-Australia (WWF-Australia) said: “Forests need protection, timber workers need jobs, home buyers need more sustainable timber. A fair and just transition from native forest logging to plantations will deliver these.”

Andrew Wong from Wilderness Australia said: “This process is likely to result in the most significant changes to native forest logging in NSW in more than twenty years. It means the Minns Government accepts that business as usual isn’t working. We’re supportive of the government’s desire to do better in our forests. 

“A critical early recommendation for the panel must be that logging is halted immediately in areas containing high numbers of koalas, greater gliders and other endangered species. We can’t discuss how to protect something while it is being destroyed in front of our eyes,” Andrew Wong said.  

Susie Russel from the North Coast Environment Council said: “We do not want to see this process delay action to protect the koala and greater glider. The NSW Government is currently logging parts of the proposed Great Koala National Park and the state owned logging company has been reported for repeated illegal logging in glider habitat. 

“The Government can and should act now to stop logging in these critical areas. They don’t need an expert panel to tell us logging shouldn’t be occurring in National Parks or be allowed to destroy the homes of threatened species,” Susie said.  

Jacqui Mumford from the Nature Conservation Council NSW said: “The balance to be struck is to meet our timber needs from plantations while allowing our native forests to sequester carbon, be a refuge for our koalas, gliders and cockatoos and clean our air and water. Victoria and Western Australia have recently ended native forest logging and now it’s time for NSW to do the same.” 

Justin Field said, “The Alliance wrote to Premier Minns last week outlining our expectations for this process and we reiterate calls for this panel to be informed by an independent expert in forest ecology and that any data provided by Forestry Corporation about wood supply and forest yields be subject to peer review and be made public. 

For this process to be credible it needs to be open and transparent and the information the panel relies on needs to be public and subject to independent analysis,” Justin Field said. 

The Alliance letter to Premier Minns’ is here.

On August 15 2024 the NSW Audit Office released its report into 'Threatened species and ecological communities'.

The report noted that over 1,100 native animals, plants and ecological communities are listed as threatened in New South Wales. The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) delivers programs and activities aiming to reduce the risk of extinction for threatened species and ecological communities. 

The audit assessed whether DCCEEW has effectively delivered outcomes to support threatened species and ecological communities across New South Wales including delivery of the statutory Biodiversity Conservation Program (Saving our Species). 

The Findings were the DCCEEW uses a risk‑based approach to guide and deliver a range of programs aiming to improve the outcomes for threatened species and ecological communities.

However, DCCEEW has not effectively determined departmental priorities, coordinated programs to align efforts, or reported on the overall outcomes it is delivering for threatened species and ecological communities. 

Further, DCCEEW does not capture sufficient data to monitor species that it is not actively managing, creating a risk that it cannot readily identify or respond to further decline.

Under the Saving our Species program, DCCEEW is delivering conservation actions for less than one‑third of all threatened species and ecological communities. This number has reduced over time, in line with reduced program funding. 

Gaps in core program planning and risk management frameworks create program delivery risks. 

The report, which can be read in full via the link above, made several recommendations to DCCEEW, focusing on:

  • Strengthening Saving our Species program compliance, governance, planning and risk management frameworks.
  • Developing a long‑term framework to coordinate and align efforts across DCCEEW for the delivery of threatened species outcomes.
  • Expanding activities to improve coordination with other parts of government delivering activities that impact on outcomes for threatened species.

On March 20th 2023 Dr. Scamps issued a media release stating, ''Later today I will move a motion in Parliament calling on the Albanese Government to rapidly end the logging of Australia’s public native forests.''

Scamps Launches Save our Aussie Bush Petition


On Tuesday August 27 2024 the MP for Mackellar MP announced;

''Today I am launching a petition to save our precious native forests and the unique animals that live there from further destruction.

I want every Australian who bushwalks, camps or just enjoys a moment in nature to fight to save our Aussie bush.

The Australian bush, with all its incredible creatures, is for so many of us the embodiment of Australia. The sights, the sounds, the smells, the animals and the insects it houses are uniquely Australian, to be found nowhere else on this planet.

But Australia leads the world when it comes to extinctions. Many of our unique species like the iconic koala, black glossy cockatoo, and the greater glider are now listed as endangered.

Scientists say urgent action is required to reverse the decline.'' Dr. Scamps said in a statement

''But even now, the Albanese Government allows 500,000 hectares of native Aussie bushland to be logged or cleared every single year. These are the homes and food of our threatened wildlife.

Most of the timber taken from our native state forests ends up as woodchips or low value products like pallets and tomato stakes. The building industry prefers plantation timbers for construction.

Worse still, you and I subsidise this destructive practice, and despite this, state-owned forestry corporations have been losing millions on their native forest operations for years.

One of the most important solutions is to end native forest logging.

Victoria and Western Australia have already done this. Laggard states like NSW and Tasmania should do the same.

We need our federal government to lead. It should immediately reverse the exemption for state-owned forestry operations from the national environmental law - the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

The Albanese government promised stronger environment laws, it signed treaties to tackle climate change and reverse extinctions. It’s even hosting an international “Nature Positive” summit in October.

But we don’t just want promises and discussions. Let’s see some real action. Join me and sign the petition to save the Aussie Bush.''

The 'Save the Aussie Bush' petition is at: www.change.org/p/save-the-aussie-bush

Meanwhile, more Australian wildlife will be killed today as its home burrow, stream and tree are destroyed, while those families are in their homes. 

A 2018 WWF report found tree-clearing killed more than 87 million animals in New South Wales between 1998 and 2015.

Written in collaboration with the University of Sydney’s Professor Christopher Dickman, the report found more than 517,000 hectares of native bushland were destroyed over the 17 years – an area near twice the size of the Blue Mountains National Park.

This destruction led to the deaths of about 5 million animals each year, totalling 9.1 million mammals, 10.7 million birds, and 67.1 million reptiles.

That is 13,698.6 lives lost every single day.

Imagine if they Australian humans - would citizens continue to vote back in either side of the same coin? 

This number may have doubled to over 10 million per year after the Native Vegetation Act was repealed to make it easier to legally bulldoze forests by the prior coalition government, and atop the pre-approved 20 year extension of the Coastal Integrated Forestry Operations Approvals (IFOA)

Research revealed in 2023 by the Australian Conservation Foundation found that in the last decade, the Australian Federal Government had approved the demolition of more than 200,000 hectares of threatened species habitat. 

The koala has lost more habitat to federal, state and local government-approved destruction than any other animal.

While 72% of the total habitat federally-approved for destruction was for mining, 400,000 hectares of threatened species habitat was annihilated to make way for sheep and cattle grazing in Queensland alone in just one year. 

The Australian Bureau of Statistics' June 6 2024 'Insights into Australian Exports of Meat' records Australia was the 4th largest exporter of beef in 2022, and supplied 50% of global sheep meat in 2023. Forecasts suggest Australia could become the second largest exporter of beef in 2024.

Which makes this nation a World Champion at slaughtering other animals to eat, Gold Medallists in killing any other species that once lived here - Australia is in the top five for extinction of animals and plant species, and the Top 10 for endangered and threatened species - and winning a place in the Top 10 for for deforestation, albeit ranked behind Brazil, Indonesia and the Congo, but still making it in at number 5 in a race to turn the planet into a silent concrete tomb.

An oldie from 1989 - when some think the 'Forest Wars' were won - and dedicated to the over 6 thousand doe eyed, gentle, melodious, funny, happy, loving Australians family members who will be deliberately killed today.

Urgent interim action needed as NSW clears 570 football fields of habitat each day 

September 13, 2024

The Nature Conservation Council of New South Wales (NCC), the state’s leading environmental advocacy organisation, has called on the NSW Government to act on its commitment to stop the runaway land clearing that is continuing to decimate NSW bush. 

NSW remains in the midst of an extinction crisis which will continue to gather pace until the root cause – widespread and unregulated destruction of our habitat encouraged by the former government – is addressed.   

The latest vegetation clearing data shows that clearing continues to devastate large swathes of habitat every year. In NSW, an equivalent of 300 times the Sydney CBD is cleared annually, or 570 football fields per day.  

The annual Statewide Land and Tree Study (SLATS) data released today shows, yet again, a shocking amount of habitat was cleared across the state, taking the average to 84,000 hectares of native vegetation (defined as trees, shrubs or woody vines, or understory and groundcover plants that have been relatively undisturbed since 1990) being cleared every year for the past five years.  

Habitat clearing is, alongside climate change, the most significant threat to species in NSW, the worst ranked state in the country for protecting and restoring trees. 

NCC Chief Executive Officer, Jacqui Mumford stated: 

“These new figures still show the urgent need for reform. Every day of inaction means more species are at an ever-growing risk of going extinct.” 

“Our nature laws in NSW are broken and unable to protect habitat.” 

“The government has asked the Natural Resources Commission to come up with new options to stop runaway habitat clearing and protect critical species. We are heartened by this process but concerned about the slow timeframe – interim action to protect critical habitat must be taken given the numbers we are seeing today”

“Protecting critically endangered ecosystems is urgent and needs to happen yesterday.” 

“The existing Native Vegetation Code is an inappropriate regulatory tool for managing impacts on biodiversity in rural areas. It permits a completely unsustainable amount of clearing without any robust environmental assessment or approval requirements. The new data shows that we don’t know the circumstances under which nearly half of the non-woody vegetation clearing happened in 2022. It may be illegal clearing – we just don’t know.”

“Clearly the scope of ‘allowable’ vegetation clearing activities is too broad and open to misuse.” 

“We need urgent interim action to immediately protect critically endangered ecosystems. These precious places and the critters than rely on them cannot wait while the scale of reform we require is nowhere to be seen.” 

More In: For Those Whose Home Is Among The Gum Trees: Scamps, Labor Members, Greens, Australians at Local, State + Federal Level call for a Cessation of Habitat Destruction as NSW Government touts an 'Forestry Industry Action Plan' Consultation

Update: Government rejects "Increase Penalties for Urban Forest Tree Vandalism and Recognise Trees as Natural Assets in the IP&R Framework of The Local Government Act" petition - hundreds of trees lost in one fell swoop at lane cove or in pittwater count for nothing

This petition, which many residents in Pittwater signed and asked the news service to run here as well, to make people aware of the changes called for, has received a reply, as required, from The Hon. Ron Hoenig, Minister for Local Government.

Mr. Hoenig has rejected any changes being made.

The petition presented by the Member for Blue Mountains and Parliamentary Secretary for the Environment, Labor's Ms Trish Doyle MP,  requested an increase in penalties for urban forest tree vandalism, as well as an amendment to the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) to include natural assets, such as trees, in the asset registers of councils and to report on them in balance sheets. 

Although Mr. Hoenig stated it is important that our urban forests are protected for future generations, and his response agreed the proposal to amend the LG Act to include natural assets on councils’ balance sheets is important, he stated the issues surrounding financial sustainability and the negative affect of depreciation currently facing Councils means that the Government would only consider any move to further modify the financial systems of Councils after extensive consultation in relation to the intended and unintended consequences. 

Further. Mr. Hoenig's response states he has been advised that the Department of Planning, Housing, and Infrastructure has been undertaking consultation to better understand the issue and to inform the review of measures to deter and prosecute individuals who clear trees illegally.

The Department consulted with 20 councils during 2023, facilitated two workshops for Greater Sydney and regional councils in April 2024, held a survey of council staff which received close to 100 responses, and held consultation with the Office of Local Government and Local Government NSW.

Finally Mr. Hoenig referred to the State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 which allows councils to regulate the clearing of vegetation on non-rural land through a permit system. 

Mr. Hoenig stated that clearing without a permit on public or private land is a criminal offence that already attracts significant penalties, an on-the-spot fine of $3,000 for individuals, or $6,000 for corporations may be applied. Penalties of up to $1 million for an individual or $5 million for a corporation can be applied if successfully prosecuted in court.

However, as can be seen far and wide, a fine of less than a thousand dollars per tree, if caught, is the norm and no deterrent to those determined to remove trees for views or convenience while building their multi-million dollar edifices.

See: Destruction of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest at warriewood: Developers dreams remain a Community nightmare - November 2018

And: Council Victory In Court Over Illegal Clearing Of Trees = 10k For 14 Killed Trees: 'A Poor Outcome' Residents State - May 2023

Residents state while this 'state of the urban environment' persists unprotected, and unchanged, the loss of trees, habitat and wildlife will continue.

The petition reads:

Petition To the Speaker and Members of the Legislative Assembly,  

In November 2023, Lane Cove witnessed the worst act of environmental vandalism in its history. Nearly 300 trees and plants were illegally removed from Council-owned bushland in LonguevilleLocal governments received more than 1000+ reports of trees being damaged or killed in the previous 12 months. 

Our urban forests are under threat. These acts also put a financial burden on already cash-strapped councils. It's time to take stronger action against those who harm our environment. 

Current fines for tree vandalism in NSW are $3,000 for individuals and $6,000 for companies, compared with recent reforms in the ACT imposing fines up to $80,000. 

We ask the Legislative Assembly to call on the Government to significantly increase penalties for urban forest tree vandalism. 

Councils lack resources for thorough criminal investigations, hindering effective prosecution. Despite the illegality of tree vandalism under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, only 19 cases were prosecuted from 2018 to 2022. 

We the undersigned petitioners also ask the Legislative Assembly to call on the Government to amend the NSW Local Government Act to include trees in Councils' asset registers as 'natural assets', allocate a budget for a collaboration of councils to undertake pilot projects to integrate natural capital/asset reporting in balance sheets and develop natural asset data capture and management standards.

Recognising trees as 'natural assets' helps us appreciate their true value including their role in combating climate change and preserving biodiversity.

Petition Response Response by the Hon Ron Hoenig—received 10 September 2024—to petition lodged 6 August 2024—Increase Penalties for Urban Forest Tree Vandalism and Recognise Trees as Natural Assets in the IP&R Framework of The Local Government Act—(Ms Trish Doyle)

Tracking of Petitions with 500 or more Signatures
Petition Category 500+
Number Of Signatories 3,575
Presented By Doyle, Trish
Minister Responsible Minister for Local Government
Petition Status Response Received
Response Due Tuesday, 10 September 2024
Response Received Tuesday, 10 September 2024

Update: federal Labor and Coalition Block Bill to End Native Forest Logging

September 11, 2024

Federal Labor and the Coalition have today voted together to block Greens' legislation to end logging of Australia’s native forests.

The Greens’ state their legislation sought to repeal Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs), which have allowed logging corporations to continue destroying native forests without having to comply with federal environmental laws.

“Labor and the Coalition have turned their backs on Australia’s forests, our wildlife, and our future,” Greens forests spokesperson Senator Nick McKim said.

“Today’s vote - which had the support of crossbenchers Senator Pocock and Senator Payman -  shows that the only thing standing in the way of ending native forest logging is the Labor Party.”

“They’re choosing to protect the interests of logging corporations over the environment and the long-term survival of threatened species like the Leadbeater's possum and the Swift parrot.” 

“The evidence is clear – native forest logging has to end if we are serious about protecting biodiversity and addressing climate change.”

“These forests are home to endangered species, and their destruction is accelerating the extinction crisis and driving climate change.”

“The fact that Labor and the Coalition can continue supporting these destructive exemptions is indefensible, reckless, and completely out of touch with community expectations.”

“The Greens won’t stop fighting until native forest logging is history.”

“Nature is under unprecedented attack around the world, and there is simply no excuse to continue logging precious native forests while the climate is breaking down and ecosystems are crumbling.”

“We’re standing up for Australia’s forests and the species that rely on them, and we’ll keep building pressure to ensure these crucial ecosystems are protected for future generations.”

More in: Update on Ruskin Rowe Trees post August 6, 2024 Council Meeting: Last two still scheduled for destruction in October - Cr. Korzy's Tree Stewardship - tree Management review motion passed 

Ruskin Row Blockade Provides Reprieve To Flooded Gums: Residents Fed-Up With Council Destruction Of Pittwater's Trees - 30 Thousand Trees Lost Since Forced Union Of Pittwater With Warringah

And: Lizard Rock (Patyegarang planning Proposal) Update: August 2024

NSW Forestry plan must end native forest logging and invest in a plantation based timber industry

Forest Alliance NSW
MEDIA RELEASE
26 August 2024

The Forest Alliance NSW is calling on a newly announced expert panel, set up by the Minns Labor Government to advise it on the future of forestry, to put ending native forest logging front and centre of their investigation. 

Justin Field from the Forest Alliance NSW said: “The Alliance welcomes the process and will work constructively with the panel but it must fully investigate ending native forest logging to shift to a sustainable plantation based timber industry and to protect the state’s most iconic species like the Koala and Greater Glider.’ 

Stuart Blanch from the World Wide Fund for Nature-Australia (WWF-Australia) said: “Forests need protection, timber workers need jobs, home buyers need more sustainable timber. A fair and just transition from native forest logging to plantations will deliver these.”

Andrew Wong from Wilderness Australia said: “This process is likely to result in the most significant changes to the native forest logging in NSW in more than twenty years. It means the Minns Government accepts that business as usual isn’t working. We’re supportive of the government’s desire to do better in our forests. 

“A critical early recommendation for the panel must be that logging is halted immediately in areas containing high numbers of koalas, greater gliders and other endangered species. We can’t discuss how to protect something while it is being destroyed in front of our eyes,” Andrew Wong said.  

Susie Russel from the North Coast Environment Council said: “We do not want to see this process delay action to protect the koala and greater glider. The NSW Government is currently logging parts of the proposed Great Koala National Park and the state owned logging company has been reported for repeated illegal logging in glider habitat. 

“The Government can and should act now to stop logging in these critical areas. They don’t need an expert panel to tell us logging shouldn’t be occurring in National Parks or be allowed to destroy the homes of threatened species,” Susie said.  

Jacqui Mumford from the Nature Conservation Council NSW said: “The balance to be struck is to meet our timber needs from plantations while allowing our native forests to sequester carbon, be a refuge for our koalas, gliders and cockatoos and clean our air and water. Victoria and Western Australia have recently ended native forest logging and now it’s time for NSW to do the same.” 

Justin Field said, “The Alliance wrote to Premier Minns last week outlining our expectations for this process and we reiterate calls for this panel to be informed by an independent expert in forest ecology and that any data provided by Forestry Corporation about wood supply and forest yields be subject to peer review and be made public. 

For this process to be credible it needs to be open and transparent and the information the panel relies on needs to be public and subject to independent analysis,” Justin Field said. 

Media Release: Proposal to extend carbon credits to native Forest

by Forestry Australia; July 30, 2024

''Forestry Australia is leading an Australian initiative to expand Australia’s carbon credits across all native forest tenures, including State forests, private native forests, forests managed by Traditional Owners, national parks and conservation reserves.

The Forestry Australia ‘Enhancing Native Forest Resilience’ proposal is a forest-sector-led submission to the Australian Government’s Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee EOI process for Australian Carbon Credits Units (ACCU) Scheme methods.

This innovative model is based on a growing body of published work that shows forests that are actively managed can have greater carbon potential.

Under this method, active management means deliberate human care of forests through implementing practices to restore and improve carbon, forest health and resilience outcomes.

Forestry Australia President Michelle Freeman said there were huge untapped opportunities.

“There is a growing body of published work that shows our forests are not only more resilient if they are actively managed, but they can deliver greater carbon abatement benefits,” Dr Freeman said.

“Our proposed new Enhancing Native Forest Resilience method is specifically focussed on unlocking the carbon potential across all types of native forests – when they remain forest land.

“This would provide additional revenue streams for our national parks, state forests and private forests, specifically to support more investment in ecologically sustainable forest management, thereby enhancing landscape resilience, biodiversity and social outcomes from our forests.

“It would maximise carbon market opportunities to more land owners, from state government agencies managing state forests and national parks, as well as community groups, not-for-profits, private land owners and First Nations Peoples.”

This alternate approach to carbon credits will incentivise investment in the resilience and ecologically sustainable management of Australia’s native forests, while also allowing for continuing supply of locally and sustainably sourced timber and wood products - unlocking greater opportunities for Australia to meet its Paris Targets.

“Our approach is more nuanced than approaches that entertain only one option for improving forest carbon outcomes,” Dr Freeman said. “This method recognises that the problem and solution requires a more holistic approach, it’s based on considering and providing options for applying a broader range of different forest management tools in the toolkit.

“If we extend the potential options for earning carbon credits, we not only generate extra eligible carbon abatement opportunities for Australia, but we also enhance the resilience and ecological values of the Australian forest landscape while continuing to supply local high quality wood products from areas where that is appropriate, it’s a win-win-win.

“Active management can also support sustainable livelihoods for regional communities and open up options for self-determination by land holders and managers to achieve the best possible and holistic outcomes.

The proposed project activities under Enhancing Native Forest method can be grouped into three groups:

# Restorative forestry practices: projects that restore ecological health and carbon through forest restoration and regenerative forestry practices where forests have been degraded by wildfires, pest and diseases, or other significant disturbances.  

# Adaptive harvesting practices: projects that reduce carbon emissions and improve carbon storage in forests currently available for timber harvesting, while allowing for a level of ongoing supply of wood products, by altering timber harvesting approaches or resting areas from harvest.

# Improved utilisation of harvested wood products: projects that improve carbon storage in wood products by shifting the production of lower grade logs for short-lived wood products into higher grade logs and long-lived wood products.

Forestry Australia is pleased to have this opportunity to contribute directly to the further development and growth of the ACCU Scheme in Australia, and to present a proposal to the Australian Government that highlights the importance of supporting ecologically sustainable forest management for all native forests, especially in the face of increasing threats from wildfires, invasive pest species and other factors exacerbated by climate change. ''

Industry push to earn carbon credits from Australia’s native forests would be a blow for nature and the climate

Shutterstock
David Lindenmayer, Australian National University; Brendan Mackey, Griffith University, and Heather Keith, Griffith University

Australia’s forestry industry raised eyebrows this month when it released plans to remove trees from native forests, potentially including national parks, and claim carbon credits in the process.

Forestry Australia, the industry body behind the plan, claims it would make ecosystems more resilient and help tackle climate change. But decades of research findings clearly suggest the proposal, if accepted, will have the opposite effect.

Scientific evidence shows some proposed practices make forests more fire-prone and undermine forest health. And the carbon released when cutting down and processing trees would undercut any climate benefits of the plan.

Australia cannot risk any more declines in biodiversity resulting from harvesting native forests, or actions that further threaten its emissions-reduction goal. On this basis, the Forestry Australia proposal should be rejected.

Understanding Australia’s carbon credit scheme

Under a federal government scheme, people and businesses can undertake projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions or store carbon, in exchange for financial rewards known as carbon credits.

Projects can include changing the way vegetation is managed, so it removes and stores more carbon from the atmosphere.

The government has invited proposals for new ways to generate carbon credits under the policy.

Forestry Australia’s proposal involves a number of activities conducted in national parks, state forests and on private land. In return for conducting these activities, land managers – such as government agencies and private landowners – would be granted carbon credits.

One part of the method involves “adaptive harvesting”. Forestry Australia says the approach would reduce carbon emissions and improve carbon storage in forests “while allowing for a level of ongoing supply of wood products”.

Adaptive harvesting purports to reduce environmental impacts but still produce wood products. Techniques can include delaying logging until trees are older, resting areas from harvesting and minimising areas cleared for roads and log landings.

The proposal also involves “forest thinning”, or removing trees. In a statement to The Conversation, Forestry Australia’s acting president William Jackson said thinning involves “selectively reducing the number of trees to enable the healthy trees to grow”.

Forestry Australia says it has not proposed timber production from national parks. However, it did not say what would happen to trees cut down in thinning operations, including whether they would be sold or left on the forest floor.

Forestry Australia has also proposed to change the way harvested wood is used, so it stores carbon for longer.

So, instead of harvesting low-grade logs used for woodchips and paper, it would harvest more valuable logs to be made into longer-lived timber products, such as roof trusses and floorboards.

However, plantation forests already produce about 90% of logs harvested in Australia, raising questions over the demand for native forest logs.

timber roof truss
The plan involves harvesting more valuable logs to be made into longer-lived timber products such as roof trusses. Shutterstock

Logging does not make forests resilient

Announcing Forestry Australia’s proposal, its president Michelle Freeman said forests were “more resilient if they are actively managed”.

But several adaptive harvesting practices are scientifically shown to harm native forests.

For example, analyses following the 2009 wildfires and after the 2019-2020 wildfires show thinning generally makes forests more fire-prone. Foresters have themselves highlighted this problem. And the heavy equipment used to log forests disturbs and degrades soil and the understorey.

What’s more, young trees – the usual targets of thinning – provide understorey habitat for many species, including endangered mammals, such as Leadbeater’s Possum and many species of birds.

And thinning undermines a forest’s ability to withstand other threats, such as climate change.

A big climate risk

Forestry Australia’s proposal is problematic if Australia hopes to achieve its emissions-reduction target of 43% by 2030, based on 2005 levels.

First, logging releases carbon stored in trees and soil. So, even if some carbon was stored under the plan – through activities such as regeneration – this would be undermined by carbon released when removing trees.

Second, there is a risk carbon credits may be granted for activities and emission reductions that would have happened anyway.

Take the proposal to provide carbon credits for adaptive harvesting. Most of these activities, such as forest regeneration, are already required by regulation and forestry codes of practice.

And in the case of the proposal to conduct regeneration activities after bushfires, forests will regenerate naturally if they are left alone.

A similar issue arises if forest managers are offered carbon credits to encourage timber to be turned into long-lived wood products. These products are more lucrative than, say, woodchips. So the financial incentive to create them already exists – and there’s a good chance suitable logs would have been used for these products regardless of whether carbon credits were offered.

What’s more, the average life of these longer-lived timber products is still far less than the standing trees.

Rules under Australia’s carbon credit scheme are meant to prevent credits being given for activities that would have occurred anyway. However, serious concerns have been raised over the effectiveness of these rules.

The answer is clear

Australia’s native forest logging industry has long been in decline and operates at a financial loss in most states.

Adding to the industry’s demise, Victoria and Western Australia have called an end to logging in public native forests and southeast Queensland is reportedly set to follow.

The flailing, damaging native forest logging industry is on the way out and plantations already provide almost all our sawn wood supply. Propping up the industry via a badly designed carbon credit method does not make economic or climate sense.


In response to the points raised in this article, Forestry Australia’s acting president William Jackson provided the following statement. It has been edited for brevity.

Adaptive harvesting practices are proposed only for state forests and private native forests, within areas where timber harvesting is expressly permitted and regulated under state-based legislation.

Thinning is conducted for ecological reasons, cultural values or fire management or other reasons. Forestry Australia disagrees with the view that thinning makes forests more fire prone. The inclusion of thinning in native forests in the method is supported by clear evidence from Australian and international research showing that thinning of forests, when combined with prescribed burning to reduce fuel hazards, can significantly reduce wildfire risks and impacts in dry forests.

Not all forests are in the condition to regenerate naturally due to the impacts of climate change, invasive species and wildfire. The method encourages active and adaptive management to assist in restoring the health and resilience of these forests.

This method would maximise carbon market opportunities to more landowners, from state government agencies managing state forests and national parks, as well as community groups, not-for-profits, private landowners and First Nations Peoples.The Conversation

David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University; Brendan Mackey, Director, Griffith Climate Action Beacon, Griffith University, and Heather Keith, Senior Research Fellow in Ecology, Griffith University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Laughs, cries and deception: birds’ emotional lives are just as complicated as ours

Sulphur-crested cockatoos form long-term pair bonds, perhaps explaining their emotional intelligence. Ian Sanderson/Flickr, CC BY-NC
Gisela Kaplan, University of New England

July on the Northern Tableland, near Armidale in New South Wales, is usually the beginning of the breeding season and field observations start early.

I sat and watched in freezing temperatures. The sun was just rising above the horizon of this 1000m-high plateau when through binoculars I saw a young lone magpie, walking gingerly, literally tip-toeing, occasionally interrupted by little bouts of running and, unusually, heading straight for its territorial boundary.

In the last stretch to the border, the bird edged along a row of pine trees, staying low, and kept looking over its shoulder, especially when crossing the neighbour’s border. Shortly afterwards, a female was seen in his company.

Later, the male backtracked and, when far enough into his own territory, started foraging rather aimlessly as if nothing had happened.

The magpie who snuck over the border. Gisela Kaplan

What had I witnessed? Did this young male magpie understand that he was breaking several important magpie social rules and could face punishment for this transgression if caught? Did he have a sense of morality?

Science has traditionally shunned the idea of emotions in animals, not just for fear of anthropomorphism or over-interpretation, but also because there is a very long cultural history that played out a divide between mind and body and reason and emotions.

Reason, thinking and making judgements were stubbornly thought to be outside the capacity of animals. For a long time it was not believed that animals were even capable of feeling pain, let alone complex emotions. We now know that is far from the truth.

Birds with feelings

Pet owners have always known that their pets can be affectionate, sulky, jealous, sad, excited and deliberately naughty, as well as doing extraordinary things for their owners. The animals we know best in this regard are obviously dogs and cats.

Charles Darwin was the first to discuss emotions in animals in the mid-19th century. A century later, Niko Tinbergen addressed the vexing question of emotions.

Following on from Darwin, he identified “four Fs” as part of survival: fight, flee, fornicate and feed. These translate into basic feelings of fear, hunger and sexual drive – now called motivational states.

Tawny frogmouths are monogamous. cskk/Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND

But there is a lot more to bird emotions. Dangerous and horrible experiences are usually remembered. Memory helps survival. Modern urban birds have been shown to remember faces of people considered dangerous and threatening.

We now know that the bird brain is lateralised (each side of the brain controls a different set of functions) as in humans and other vertebrates. The right hemisphere expresses intense emotions (such as fear and attack). The left hemisphere has routine, considered responses and may inhibit some of the strong responses of the right hemisphere.

So birds are more similar to humans than had ever been thought, but with an important difference: birds are generally not aggressive without cause. Technically, aggression is an emotion that is dysfunctional, has no purpose and often even harms the individual displaying it.

Birds can certainly get very angry – and the owner of a galah or corella would be well advised not to get near this bird when the head feathers are raised — but birds can be joyful and playful, can get depressed and, as studies have shown, a neglectful or bare environment can even make them pessimistic.

Birds may feel for others (have empathy) and even console them, may have a sense of justice, may show deep affection for their partner and grieve for their loss. I witnessed the mate of a fatally injured tawny frogmouth not moving from the spot next to its dead partner for three days, and then dying on the fourth.

Social smarts

Australian native birds have an unusually high percentage of pair-bonding (over 90% of species) and the highest concentrations of cooperative species (relatives or siblings helping at the nest) anywhere in the world. Cockatoos bonding for life often have intense close partnerships, which are nurtured by constant grooming and attention to each other’s needs.

Such intense cohabitation of individuals, often for many years (how about 60 years of “marriage” in sulphur-crested cockatoos?), may also create frictions and dissatisfactions that require solutions to keep the pair or group together.

For instance, the lazy helper at the nest who only pretends to help in feeding, as happens among white-winged choughs, may get scolded by an adult. A group of apostlebirds building a mud nest together, transporting mud to the nest in relays, may spot an individual that is not pulling its weight.

Apostlebirds breed in families, and all are expected to pull their weight. Gisela Kaplan, Author provided

I have witnessed on several occasions near Copeton Dam (in Inverell, NSW) apostlebirds become so outraged that they approach the individual with heightened calling and may even peck it until the intimidated individual falls back into line and does its share.

Empathy, altruism and consoling the injured or vanquished have all been observed in birds, thought to be the ultimate in consideration for another individual’s state of mind.

For instance, there are observations of dusky wood-swallows (belonging to the same family of birds as butcherbirds and magpies) in Western Australia’s Wheatbelt hassling a restless flycatcher with a larva in his beak, perched on a branch. One wood-swallow flew above the flycatcher, while the other simultaneously flew directly at it, snatched the larva from its beak while it was distracted by the other bird hovering overhead, and took it away. So who got the prize?

If all behaviour in animals is selfish, then the one who caught it should have gulped it down, but it did not. It gave it to the bird that had distracted the flycatcher. Perhaps the two birds reversed roles in the next, similar, situation. But it still meant overcoming the temptation to eat.

The noisy miner who defended a puppy. Gisela Kaplan, Author provided

A noisy miner, one of the cooperative honeyeaters, I had hand-raised grew up over several weeks in the company of very young ridgeback pups near the edge of a nature reserve in a NSW coastal area.

One pup was sleeping on the porch in the sun and I was some distance away. I was alerted by the alarm calls of the noisy miner and turned around to see it swooping right down to a lace monitor’s head – doing so over and over again. I ran as quickly as I could, by now also shouting once the risk to the pup was more than apparent.

When the monitor spotted me, it turned and fled. The noisy minor had risked its life to save the pup. At no other occasion did the bird attempt to swoop a lace monitor. Its response was very specific to this situation.

And, as I have been asked often, could birds have a sense of humour? Perhaps.

Our galah, Philip, deeply affectionate (and jealous!) had learned the names of all our dogs and was such a good mimic of our voices that he could easily and effectively call the dogs to attention.

Imagine the picture: a bird less than a foot tall, standing on the floor and calling four massive Rhodesian ridgebacks to attention. Then, when he got them all in line in front of him, he walked away, swaying his head and even making little chuckling sounds.

The degree to which emotions and complex feelings for others were developed may well depend on social organisation. It may be that birds with long-term social bonds show more complex behaviour and brains than those whose associations are only fleeting.

What they get out of it is perhaps not debatable — more joy, more grief, but also a greater degree of safety and usually a longer life. There are clear benefits of sticking together in a difficult and fickle continent.


Gisela is speaking at the Mornington Peninsula Regional Gallery on Tuesday, December 6, and Wednesday, December 7.The Conversation

Gisela Kaplan, Professor of Animal Behaviour, University of New England

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.